|
| 


Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory
Posted by: I agree on 10/17/09
I agree with the waste of money at the district office. Another large
waste of money is the increase in one on one instructional aides. I
have one period where I have 3 students with one on one aides. One
aide could easily attend to all 3 students but because the district
I'd so afraid of lawsuits they give dome students a full time side if
the parents are pushy enough. Now I barely have any for labs in my
class but we have plent y of money for aides. At what point does the
rights of one trump the rights of 30. Tthe average student is getting
the shaft these days.
On 10/17/09, Me too!! wrote:
> Yup! Corruption is running rampant in many districts. Once in
> awhile someone will get caught. A friend of mine told about the
> computer guru who caught got selling district computers on ebay.
> He finally was shipped off to prison. How many others in the
> system who has their fat salaries, fancy homes and cars, also
> should be behind bars??
> Think about it. It's out there.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> I agree totally with what Jeannie has said. How did education
>> become such a cash cow? Our district waste thousands of dollars
>> on extra consultants, needless more administrative positions at
>> the district office complete with benefit packages. These
>> people should be sent back to the classroom. This whole issue
>> is totally outrageous and does not benefits our students one
>> bit. The only ones benefiting are the powers that be with
>> whatever kickbacks they receive. Every district ought have a
>> grand jury investigation.
>>
>> Then we do all this needless yet very expensive assessing. We
>> assess, assess, and assess. Then when we're done with the
>> district assessments, it's time for the Star test. The kids
>> nowadays are taught to the test. Anyone who could successfully
>> handle discipline could go in those classrooms today. It's so
>> mechanical that it appears the kids are being taught by human
>> robots.
>>
>> The teachers SHOULD NEVER be blamed for what is forced upon
>> them. At least with the Whole Language movement that Jeannie
>> mentioned, good teachers could hide their sound materials and
>> sneak them out to do a decent job. With this current garbage,
>> it there is no hiding.
>>
>> I thought at least with a new President, there would be hope to
>> returning to a little more common sense. However, we still have
>> NCLB and worse. The idea of tying teacher evaluations to test
>> scores is the most outrageous idea yet.
>>
>> I agree with Jeannie. We need a third party. I just wonder how
>> many out there share my ideas.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I have been in public education for 38 years . When we were
>>> doing well and the kids were thriving, it wasn't "good
>>> enough." We simply taught what was required and had time for
>>> P.E., Art, and Music. It was well-balanced and our
>>> achievement tests, a clean basic test, CTBS (Comprehensive
>>> Test of Basic Skills) proved that. We had time, then, to
>>> actually teach and even time for a little creativity.
>>>
>>>
>>> BUT...evidently, not enough creativity. SO PRESTO: the
>>> publishing giants have just the materials to "fix" it. Along
>>> comes the Whole Language disaster. We tossed the books (I
>>> didn't; I hid them so I could teach). Our rooms were "print
>>> rich" and the kids would learn to read "naturally" with all
>>> the fun and games etc. Math was taught so children
>>> would "think" but while they were "thinking" their
>>> computation skills went down the tubes. Thousands of
>>> taxpayers dollars went down the tubes right with them.
>>>
>>> Okay, the Whole Language movement proved to be a disaster
>>> so the kids really couldn't read and write well. SO PRESTO
>>> AGAIN: The publishing giants are at it again. They have
>>> their printing presses rolling and new and "wonderful"
>>> programs to fix the mess their other products created.
>>>
>>> The standards went from fun and games to ridiculously high
>>> standards that even some affluent districts couldn't
>>> achieve. The more difficult the standards, the lower the
>>> test scores. Thus, there would be a greater need to "fix"
>>> the problem.
>>>
>>> So more money went flying out of the taxpayers wallets and
>>> into the hands of CEO's, lobbyists etc. etc. The political
>>> football game continues.
>>>
>>> I have NOT seen a huge change in kids over the years. And
>>> some of my highest academic achievers have been ESL kids.
>>> They may be from lower economic families but those families
>>> value education.
>>>
>>> The real answer answer, in my opinion, is an HONEST third
>>> party that will clean up the mess AND CORRUPTION in this
>>> country. With that, California may have a shot at again
>>> reclaiming the top educational system in the nation!
>>>
>>> Just my thoughts and opinions,
>>> Jeannie
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/15/09, by wondering.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/15/09, by Cnn.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/15/09, by same answer.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/15/09, by sped.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/15/09, by Judy2/CA.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/16/09, by teacher in so CA.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/16/09, by really?.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/16/09, by Funding on a shoestring can be made to appear to work fine..
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/16/09, by yep.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/17/09, by Renee G.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/17/09, by SN.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/17/09, by Jeannie.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/17/09, by Elementary Teacher with 34 years in.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/17/09, by Judy2/CA.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/17/09, by Me too!!.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/17/09, by I agree.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/18/09, by an annual cash stream of a trillion dollars.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/21/09, by svaipae.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/25/09, by mrs.h.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/25/09, by Not a Whole Language Fan.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/25/09, by my view.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/25/09, by Not a Whole Language Fan as Such.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/25/09, by I Couldn't Agree More.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/25/09, by just me.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/26/09, by an answer.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/26/09, by Pressure from the Polticians and Kickbacks!!!.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/26/09, by A Frustrated Teacher.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/26/09, by Veteran Teacher.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly--Conspiracy Theory, 10/27/09, by my say.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/29/09, by anon.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/30/09, by interesting.
- Re: Why is CA doing so poorly, 10/31/09, by Another Teacher.
- Re: Why is CA doing so "poorly" -- on the state tests? LOL!, 11/11/09, by Because the students don't give a hell about those tests!.
- Re: Why is CA doing so "poorly" -- on the state tests? LOL!, 11/11/09, by couldn't agree more .....
- Re: the state tests are "based on the eugenic bell curve", 11/11/09, by where do you wackos come up with this crap?.
- Re: the state tests are "based on the eugenic bell curve", 11/13/09, by from a wacko.
|